Tag: landlords

  • Landlords warned over negative gearing trap after tax changes rattle property market: ‘Marginally…

    Landlords warned over negative gearing trap after tax changes rattle property market: ‘Marginally…

    Explore the latest developments concerning Landlords warned over.

    Landlords warned over negative gearing trap after tax changes rattle property market: 'Marginally less attractive'

    There haven't been many budget announcements that have rattled the property market quite like this one. With negative gearing and the 50 per cent CGT discount set to be scrapped, buyers aren't sure what to do.

    Uncertainty has crept into conversations that, not long ago, were focused entirely on opportunity. Right now, that fear is centred on proposed changes to negative gearing, capital gains tax concessions, borrowing capacity pressures and broader economic uncertainty.

    Over the past several weeks, the question appearing most often in conversations with investors, accountants and brokers has been the same. Is property still worth investing in?

    Landlords warned over valuation process as new rules come into effect

    Why your super fund should help you buy a house

    Assisting members into their own homes so they do not have to pay rent in retirement would go a long way to maximising their expected post-work income.

    The government expects “[budget] reforms to negative gearing and capital gains tax to enable an additional 75,000 Australians [to] buy their own home over the next decade”.

    The changes (to choose a more neutral word) are also expected to reduce investor demand and, in turn, “likely lead to a modest and temporary slowing in housing price growth that improves affordability”.

    Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

    2025 2 In 1 diode laser hair removal And Pico 755+808+1064 suitable for all skin and hair types machine

    2025 2 In 1 diode laser hair removal And Pico 755+808+1064 suitable for all skin and hair types machine
    Click for more info. »

    Should I sell my investment property now, or after July next year?

    I have owned an investment property since 1997 and, with the proposed removal of the 50 per cent capital gains tax (CGT) discount, I am confused about the rules that may apply after July 2027. I originally owned two apartments, but sold one in 2015, using the proceeds to pay out the mortgages on both properties. The remaining apartment is no longer negatively geared, so the rental income, combined with my pensions, places me in a higher tax bracket. I understand that I will have to pay CGT whether the 50 per cent discount remains available. What confuses me is the proposed new system that allows increases in the Consumer Price Index to be considered when calculating the taxable gain. The treasurer said the system from July 2027 will be based on the pre-1999 rules, which I know little about.

    For more detailed information, explore updates concerning Landlords warned over.

    For more news…

  • Landlords ‘held to ransom by renters’ in Aussie state leads to calls for change | Veolia’s Hamp…

    Landlords ‘held to ransom by renters’ in Aussie state leads to calls for change | Veolia’s Hamp…

    Explore the latest developments concerning Landlords 'held to.

    Landlords 'held to ransom by renters' in Aussie state leads to calls for change

    Aussie father of two Dan Yeats thought buying an investment property would help set him up for retirement. But purchasing an interstate home through his self-managed superannuation fund turned into a months-long nightmare and a very expensive lesson.

    When his tenants stopped paying rent and refused to vacate they managed to stay in the property by delaying tribunal hearings and taking advantage of Victoria's tenancy laws which have increasingly emphasised the rights of renters. And when he finally got his hands back on the property late last year, he was left with a massive and ugly clean up job.

    "I never in my life dreamed that they could get to this point," he told Yahoo Finance.

    Veolia’s Hampton Park waste facility doesn’t pass smell test, tribunal says

    ConstructionPRO delivers breaking news on litigation, deals and policy in construction, real estate and infrastructure.

    A ConstructionPRO subscription is needed to access this article. Contact Us about a subscription.

    Lawyerly is the leading source of legal news for commercial lawyers in Australia.

    To contact Lawyerly about a group subscription, email subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au.

    For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au

    Short Human Hair Wigs for Black Women Pixie Cut Wig Human Hair Wig Glueless Wigs for Women Short Pixie Straight Human Hair Wigs

    Short Human Hair Wigs for Black Women Pixie Cut Wig Human Hair Wig Glueless Wigs for Women Short Pixie Straight Human Hair Wigs
    Check it out! »

    ‘Unacceptable odour’: SEMAWP waste station refused

    A waste-to-energy project across nine councils – including Casey – is teetering after a waste-transfer station (WTS) in Hampton Park was rejected by VCAT.

    The WTS’s operator Veolia Recycling & Recovery had appealed to VCAT after the Environment Protection Authority Victoria refused a development licence last year.

    On 10 April, VCAT member Nick Wimbush upheld the EPA refusal, largely because of the potential odour impacts on nearby residents.

    The WTS was planned to collect up to 550,000 tonnes of waste a year from nine municipalities, as part of the South East Metropolitan Advanced Waste Processing consortium project.

    The waste would then be compressed and bulk-delivered to a waste-to-energy (WTE) incinerator in Maryvale.

    For more detailed information, explore updates concerning Landlords 'held to.

    For more news…